FIFA video ignites Norway’s fury over English goal controversy

England’s comeback victory on Saturday secured their place in the 2026 World Cup semifinals, eliminating Norway and intensifying Norwegian frustration over the decisive English goal. The result leaves Norway out of the semifinals and fuels a growing dispute that now involves FIFA, the English side and the Nordic nation. The match featured a disputed touch on the spider‑cam cable during Jude Bellingham’s first goal at the end of the first half, recorded at 45+2 minutes. Norway argued the cable could have altered the ball’s trajectory. FIFA responded by publishing video evidence with a sensor overlay in the lower‑left corner, indicating no spike was recorded. The organisation quoted, “Before England’s goal … the ‘connected ball’ sensor did not record any spike… therefore there was no evidence that the ball had touched the suspended cable or that its trajectory had been altered.” A new rule approved by the International Football Association Board allows a foul before a restart that directly impacts a goal to be reviewed by VAR, potentially leading to a retake. This provision underpinned the VAR decisions later in the game.

FIFA probes racist chant at World Cup after IShowSpeed abuse

Heggem’s Norwegian goal from a corner was disallowed after VAR spotted a Haaland foul in the buildup, prompting the corner to be retaken. The decision illustrated the application of the new VAR rule. After the final whistle, Alfie Haaland, father of Norway’s No. 9, expressed indignation toward French referee Clément Turpin on X, formerly Twitter, in response to a journalist’s post. His post highlighted the heightened emotions surrounding the incident. Journalist Fabrizio Romano wrote, “Two goals against Norway. Six goals in six World Cup games. Always there when England need him most. Hey, Jude (Bellingham).” Alfie Haaland replied, “Congratulations, Bellingham and referee.” The controversy remains unresolved as the World Cup semifinals proceed, leaving Norwegian fans and officials demanding further clarification. The article was translated into English by Artificial Intelligence, the original version having been published in Portuguese.