Perez backs World Cup hydration breaks but doubts water motive

Former Dutch striker Kenneth Perez told that the World Cup’s new hydration breaks have convinced him of their value, yet he insists the brief water pauses are not the primary reason they should stay. Perez highlighted the four‑quarter format, citing the Netherlands‑Sweden group match as a positive example.

The World Cup is using hydration breaks for the first time. The pauses last three minutes and occur at the halfway point of each half, allowing players to drink.

FIFA has faced criticism because the pauses appear designed for a three‑minute commercial break. Critics argue the timing benefits advertisers rather than player welfare.

Perez praised the four‑quarter concept, saying, “It’s not because of the water breaks, I don’t need them. I like the idea of four quarters. Coaches can have much more input.” He cited the group match between the Netherlands (Oranje) and Sweden (Zweden) as an example, noting that the Dutch dominated the first quarter before Sweden altered the game.

He added, “It’s not for drinking water, it’s for the commercial side. I think having a tactical pause is useful.” He believes the pause adds a tactical element that gives coaches more opportunity to influence the match.

Writer Edwin Winkels warned that some nations could be disadvantaged, stating, “De Spanjaarden feel they are harmed because their team is usually strong. After twenty minutes the opponent is out of breath and can adjust, while Spain remains strong.” Winkels suggests the rule may favour teams that can adapt quickly.