LIVE
No live matches
🌍 Other regions

DACH
Iberia
Scandinavië
Balkan
Baltische Staten
Centraal en Oost-Europa
Mediterraan
Benelux
Other countries


ONE GAME. ONE COMMUNITY. ALL TOGETHER.
← Back to articles

Penalty controversy fuels FCZ‑FCB clash as Hands rule sparks fury

🇨🇭 By 4AllFootball ·
Penalty controversy fuels FCZ‑FCB clash as Hands rule sparks fury

In the closing minutes of the classic FCZ‑FCB match at the Letzigrund stadium’s tartan track, a disputed penalty scene ignited heated debate over the Hands rule, leaving the moods (Gemüter) of both clubs and fans in turmoil today.

FCZ‑Trainer Marcel Koller appeared bewildered after the Klassiker between FCZ and FCB ended 1:2, describing the Durcheinander as larger than ever. He told SRF‑Experte Fabian Frei that he had never encountered the current Regel concerning handball. The incident unfolded during the Nachspielzeit on the Letzigrund‑Stadions Tartanbahn.

Penalty decision and VAR reversal

In the Penalty scene just before the Ablauf of the stoppage period, after the Anstosses, Basel midfielder Jonas Harder unintentionally struck the Ball with his Hand in his own Strafraum after a pass from teamkollegen Flavius Daniliuc. Schiedsrichter Anojen Kanagasingam initially pointed to the spot and awarded a Penalty, prompting jubilation among the Basler supporters.

However, the VAR intervened, and Kanagasingam walked to the monitor, reversed his decision, and signaled that no Handball offence had occurred. The reversal sparked frustration among the FCZ fans and left the Gemüter of both sides unsettled.

Interpretation of the Hands rule

Speaking into the SRF microphone, Koller admitted, “Man weiss gar nicht mehr, was, wie, wo, wann,” and added that he had no prior knowledge of the specific Regel governing such situations. He emphasized, “Für mich ist ein Handspiel im Sechzehner ein Handspiel,” and noted that Seine lack of familiarity with the Regel surprised many observers.

Das IFAB rulebook states that no Handball offence exists when a player is struck by a Ball that was played by a teammate, as was argued by the referee. This clause, written in German as “kein Handspielvergehen vorliegt, wenn ein Spieler von einem Ball, der von einem Mitspieler gespielt wurde, an der Hand/am Arm getroffen wird,” formed the basis of Kanagasingam’s reassessment.

Nachdem die VAR‑Bilder gezeigt hatten, dass ein Verteidiger versuchte, sich zu befreien, erklärte Kanagasingam, “Ich hatte auf dem Platz den Eindruck, der Ball sei von einem Zürich‑Spieler gespielt worden,” which led him to the initial Penalty call. Die Regel, according to him, indicates that in such a case “kann in diesem Fall im Prinzip kein Handspiel sein.”

SRF‑Experte Fabian Frei echoed the sentiment, stating, “Schliesslich ist es ein Fehler des FCB, wenn ein Spieler einem Teamkollegen den Ball an den Arm schiesst.” He argued that the current Hands rule, by not penalising this error, effectively rewards the mistake.

Discussion (0)

International discussion — reactions from football fans across all countries come together here. Use the translate button for comments in other languages.

Be the first to comment!

Comment on this article

Choose a display name — you don't have to use your real name

Your display name is shown, your email never. Privacy

← Back to articles