Contested arbitration: the decision that set Manchester United ablaze
In the Premier League derby at Old Trafford, Manchester United saw the only goal of the match, scored by Erling Haaland in the 60th minute, confirmed despite a refereeing error later recognised as a “judgment error”, sparking the anger of the Red Devils.
The contested goal
The goal originated from a deflected cross by Joël Gvardiol from the left flank. The Norwegian lunged at the second post and fooled goalkeeper Aaron Lammens. Initially ruled out for off‑side, the goal was validated three minutes later after the VAR intervention led by Michael Oliver.
The debate shifted to Enzo Fernandez's position, who, according to the report, was off‑side and obstructed the goalkeeper's view. Central defender Lisandro Martinez, present in the same play, could not intervene. This situation fueled the controversy surrounding the decision.
Official recognition
At the end of the match, Lisandro Martinez said: “I really don’t understand…”, while Michael Carrick expressed his despair. “How are you trying to help the referees…”, added Carrick, denouncing the control system.
In a statement released on Sunday, Pro Ref confirmed that the goal should have been disallowed. The body clarified that the VAR did not take into account the impact of Fernandez's position and that an investigation would be launched. It also contacted Manchester United to acknowledge the judgment error.
This “judgment error” has repercussions on the standings. Manchester United, relegated to 13th place, sits eight points behind the top two, Arsenal and Manchester City, who are drawing closer to each other. The result keeps the Red Devils far from European spots.
The article can be shared via the Share, Whatsapp, LinkedIn or Mail buttons, and it is available in the RMC Sport app and on the CMP website. Reading the full statement allows you to follow the developments.
The case highlights the limitations of the VAR system in the Premier League and could prompt Pro Ref to review the intervention procedures on obstruction positions. Clubs and supporters are demanding greater transparency.