LIVE
No live matches
🌍 Other regions

DACH
Iberia
Scandinavië
Balkan
Baltische Staten
Centraal en Oost-Europa
Mediterraan
Benelux
Other countries


ONE GAME. ONE COMMUNITY. ALL TOGETHER.
← Back to articles

Alonso slams Chelsea creativity after Sunderland loss

🇬🇧 ·
Alonso slams Chelsea creativity after Sunderland loss

Chelsea suffered a 1-0 defeat at Sunderland, extending a lack of creativity that has plagued them after scoring 16 goals in their first six league games. In the following four matches they have managed only four goals, highlighting a sharp drop in attacking output. Head coach Xabi Alonso appeared bemused and annoyed in the post‑match interview as he explained the team's lacklustre attack.

Decline in attacking output

He did not hold back, openly criticising Chelsea's creativity. “We were not creating enough chances in the final third against the low block,” Alonso told the BBC. “We were not moving the ball quickly, we were not controlling, sustaining the attack there.” “Those situations you need to be patient, especially at half time we have spoken, there were many interruptions but in those type of games we need to be more patient.”

Earlier, against Manchester United last weekend, Chelsea were out‑classed in one half, a performance they have not replicated since Brazilian striker João Pedro’s injury. What are the main problems for Chelsea in attack?

Sunderland defeat exposes creative void

João Pedro, the club’s leading goalscorer, was sidelined after a training injury before the loss to Spurs two weeks ago. His absence, combined with players failing to step up and Alonso’s unconventional selections, has been identified as a key factor in the attack’s decline.

Speaking to, Alonso added that the side missed “a little bit of speed on the ball, a little bit of patience.” He reiterated that playing against a low block they “didn’t create enough chances” and “were not close to scoring.”

The defeat was captured in a photograph on 8 November 2026 at the Stadium of Light, showing a dejected Alonso, Pedro Neto and Cole Palmer.

Palmer’s confidence has waned and his limited selection for England further underscores his struggles. Palmer and Morgan Rogers have missed the chance to combine with João Pedro, causing the final third to collapse.

Alonso’s decision to deploy Rogers, Pedro Neto and Geovany Quenda in unfamiliar central roles, rather than veteran striker Welbeck, was described as baffling.

Injuries to defenders Maxence Lacroix, Josh Acheampong, Jorrel Hato and Reece James have compounded the problem, given Alonso’s preferred style of play. Alonso expects his defenders to deliver the ball quickly to Palmer and Rogers in No.10 positions, a requirement that has not been met.

Against Sunderland Chelsea held 69 percent of possession but generated only 0.53 expected goals. They managed four shots on target and, apart from a few crosses, never threatened from open play.

The club hopes João Pedro returns soon, though this alone will not solve all issues.

Alonso has shifted from a three‑man attack to a flat back four, adding three holding midfielders Moisés Caicedo, Romeo Lavia and Jordan Henderson. Early in the season Chelsea won games with more adventurous formations, creating many chances, but the current setup limits forward movement.

Critics argue that employing two or three holding midfielders in front of a flat back four is unnecessary. Alonso’s selections have overcomplicated the attack since João Pedro’s injury, leaving playmakers isolated.

Although still early in his tenure, Alonso is urged to revert to the attacking principles that yielded success in August and September. The consensus is that Chelsea must embrace a more chaotic, risk‑taking approach to unlock their attack.

Chelsea

Discussion (0)

International discussion — reactions from football fans across all countries come together here. Use the translate button for comments in other languages.

Be the first to comment!

Comment on this article

Choose a display name — you don't have to use your real name

Your display name is shown, your email never. Privacy

← Back to articles